|
Post by fatguy on Mar 9, 2012 9:37:17 GMT -5
I actually enjoy trying to figure out the game mechanics more than the good guy bad guy stuff. I'm the exact same way. I hardly ever even look at the colored vote tallies.
|
|
|
Post by whodasinkitis on Mar 9, 2012 9:37:17 GMT -5
I'd like to. I had a lot of fun, especially faking, even though it wasn't up to par of a veteran fake. I just don't know if this is for me yet. I stayed quiet in-game because I was a BG and didnt want to fuck anything up. But I also stayed quiet because I simply couldn't follow the logic. X-Player voted for Y-Player on day 2 = GG. Z-Player said "Blah" on day 4 = BG. I guess that comes with experience but I failed there and could never really follow. takes time, and you really didn't get the feel of searching who is lying, cause you were BG 1st game. It is all a matter of whatever helps you sort through stuff, and most of it is a bunch of BS anyway.
|
|
|
Post by canawit on Mar 9, 2012 9:37:20 GMT -5
The worm dynamic now is interesting. If they kill him, they'll create a baby chewbanka, which will actually create another confirmed and pretty much seal the game. They don't know this. And they basically HAVE to try to kill him.
But if they leave him alive, which they won't, he could easily falsely confirm somebody based on the way he has interpreted his role.
|
|
|
Post by scooby on Mar 9, 2012 9:41:43 GMT -5
The worm dynamic now is interesting. If they kill him, they'll create a baby chewbanka, which will actually create another confirmed and pretty much seal the game. They don't know this. And they basically HAVE to try to kill him. But if they leave him alive, which they won't, he could easily falsely confirm somebody based on the way he has interpreted his role. Worm did hint that he didn't need to breadcrumb because his information would live on if he died. It's one little post and nobody picked up on it, but it's out there.
|
|
|
Post by scooby on Mar 9, 2012 9:43:47 GMT -5
"Ah, yes. The Baby Chewbanka gambit."
|
|
|
Post by fatguy on Mar 9, 2012 9:46:18 GMT -5
How is it determined who the Baby Chewbanka is? Maybe it will be someone that's already confirmed.
|
|
|
Post by scooby on Mar 9, 2012 10:19:59 GMT -5
Not that he really cares, but it would really behoove Tanner to just come out with the mason stuff now.
|
|
|
Post by canawit on Mar 9, 2012 10:21:16 GMT -5
How is it determined who the Baby Chewbanka is? Maybe it will be someone that's already confirmed. Could be. Same way anything random has worked. All 37 numbers put into sequence generator. The first number that matches a living PJV will become baby chewbanka. Could certainly be Yuk or IB. Though I would argue an astute player (even a BG) could re-read worm's description of his role and come to the conclusion that those two should not be confirmed.
|
|
|
Post by canawit on Mar 9, 2012 10:31:11 GMT -5
As long as TFC and VI live, the BGs have a chance. Between the extra kill and the ability to get someone like Sinn or Tanner lynched before they can even claim, they're not in a terrible position.
BTW: I told them how the lynch mechanic worked the first time (in a general sense) and nobody bothered to note it. I wonder if they will after a second time.
Of course, I also left a big hint that Foos was a seer, and nobody caught it either. Not that it mattered much. I think he only crumbed for players who are dead anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Matts on Mar 9, 2012 10:52:01 GMT -5
A bad BG team can shoot themselves in the foot and lose to vote analysis and not much more. Yah, to a guy who subs in D6, spends 15 minutes breezing through the game and says, "Oh yah. Here's the 4 guys you're looking for." Not bitter. Hell of a performance.
|
|
|
Post by canawit on Mar 9, 2012 10:55:10 GMT -5
A bad BG team can shoot themselves in the foot and lose to vote analysis and not much more. Yah, to a guy who subs in D6, spends 15 minutes breezing through the game and says, "Oh yah. Here's the 4 guys you're looking for." Not bitter. Hell of a performance. To be fair, I followed every post of that game from day 1. There was no breezing.
|
|
|
Post by canawit on Mar 9, 2012 10:55:42 GMT -5
Yah, to a guy who subs in D6, spends 15 minutes breezing through the game and says, "Oh yah. Here's the 4 guys you're looking for." Not bitter. Hell of a performance. To be fair, I followed every post of that game from day 1. There was no breezing. Also, thanks Otis!!
|
|
|
Post by canawit on Mar 9, 2012 11:17:31 GMT -5
Yah, to a guy who subs in D6, spends 15 minutes breezing through the game and says, "Oh yah. Here's the 4 guys you're looking for." Not bitter. Hell of a performance. To be fair, I followed every post of that game from day 1. There was no breezing. Derek> Hi!I love that picture.
|
|
|
Post by scooby on Mar 9, 2012 11:33:45 GMT -5
Have no idea why they haven't run TFC up by now. Greco making himself an easy target with the LF peej thing, though.
|
|
|
Post by scooby on Mar 9, 2012 11:38:21 GMT -5
Tufnel>I wonder if anything can be gleaned from the Ray/scoob kerfuffle regarding Foos yesterday.
Other than that I was running around with a giant "I'm Peens" sign around my neck?
And yeah, I'm a little shocked it's taken someone this long to look at that.
|
|